bgaworkshopsAug 282 min readShow and TellThe small exhibition showing upstairs in Chipping Barnet Library during September is theresult of a collaboration between a lettering artist and a poet. There are 16 pieces thatpeople can read as a story and look at as a piece of artwork. I thought that BGA membersmight be interested in the thought processes behind it, and also how it reflects on theamount of time people spend actually looking at artwork.The pieces are all ‘microfiction’, which is basically a story told with an extremely restrictedword count. It is a genre that many modern writers explore, creating fiction characterised bybrevity. I got interested in reading microfiction a few years ago when Twitter was less toxic,and authors posted stories told in less than 280 characters (“Twitterature”). As aprofessional calligrapher, I wondered if I could try presenting little stories as pieces oflettering art.I also thought about whether calligraphy would force a reader to slow down and both look atthe piece and read the text content. Calligraphy is a different beast to printed typography.We can look at a beautiful piece of lettering in a language we don’t understand andappreciate the artistry of the thing. The individuality and uniqueness of expressivehandwritten letters adds another dimension to words.But how much time do we spend looking anyway?A national exhibition of calligraphic art ‘Letters Hand Made’ is currently touring the country.While I was stewarding a visitor commented that they loved the work, and said about aparticular piece “That was the only one that I read”. I was surprised (surely everyone readsthe words?) but quickly realised that despite the hours spent by the artists sourcing orcreating their words, many will be visually skated over. People are enjoying looking at butnot necessarily reading exhibition pieces. Being used to scanning, skimming and scrollingmaybe we take little time to read.However the same applies to other works or art too. The Tate Gallery calculates theaverage time gallery visitors spend looking at each artwork as 8 seconds. They arepromoting the idea of “slow looking” to get people to fully immerse themselves in selectedpieces of work as a meditational and thoughtful exercise. https://www.tate.org.uk/art/guide-slow-lookingIf you get a chance to have a look at ‘Show and Tell’, I would be interested to know yourthoughts about whether you feel you are primarily looking or reading the work? Whicheverway your brain works, I do think to get the most out of a piece of art, you should allow time todo both. When visiting the BGA Annual Exhibition in October, I will make sure that I spendenough time to really look (and perhaps read) each piece of artworkFurther reading about slow looking: What is Slow Looking and How Can I Get Started?(thinkingmuseum.com)byGwyneth Hibbett
The small exhibition showing upstairs in Chipping Barnet Library during September is theresult of a collaboration between a lettering artist and a poet. There are 16 pieces thatpeople can read as a story and look at as a piece of artwork. I thought that BGA membersmight be interested in the thought processes behind it, and also how it reflects on theamount of time people spend actually looking at artwork.The pieces are all ‘microfiction’, which is basically a story told with an extremely restrictedword count. It is a genre that many modern writers explore, creating fiction characterised bybrevity. I got interested in reading microfiction a few years ago when Twitter was less toxic,and authors posted stories told in less than 280 characters (“Twitterature”). As aprofessional calligrapher, I wondered if I could try presenting little stories as pieces oflettering art.I also thought about whether calligraphy would force a reader to slow down and both look atthe piece and read the text content. Calligraphy is a different beast to printed typography.We can look at a beautiful piece of lettering in a language we don’t understand andappreciate the artistry of the thing. The individuality and uniqueness of expressivehandwritten letters adds another dimension to words.But how much time do we spend looking anyway?A national exhibition of calligraphic art ‘Letters Hand Made’ is currently touring the country.While I was stewarding a visitor commented that they loved the work, and said about aparticular piece “That was the only one that I read”. I was surprised (surely everyone readsthe words?) but quickly realised that despite the hours spent by the artists sourcing orcreating their words, many will be visually skated over. People are enjoying looking at butnot necessarily reading exhibition pieces. Being used to scanning, skimming and scrollingmaybe we take little time to read.However the same applies to other works or art too. The Tate Gallery calculates theaverage time gallery visitors spend looking at each artwork as 8 seconds. They arepromoting the idea of “slow looking” to get people to fully immerse themselves in selectedpieces of work as a meditational and thoughtful exercise. https://www.tate.org.uk/art/guide-slow-lookingIf you get a chance to have a look at ‘Show and Tell’, I would be interested to know yourthoughts about whether you feel you are primarily looking or reading the work? Whicheverway your brain works, I do think to get the most out of a piece of art, you should allow time todo both. When visiting the BGA Annual Exhibition in October, I will make sure that I spendenough time to really look (and perhaps read) each piece of artworkFurther reading about slow looking: What is Slow Looking and How Can I Get Started?(thinkingmuseum.com)byGwyneth Hibbett
Comments